| Forums | Reply | Search | Statistics | Return to Toplist | Imageboard | Toolbar | 

Questions topchan.info Forum / Questions /

About Reviews

 Page Page 2 of 2:  ««  1  2 
Author Guest
#16 | Posted: 21 Aug 2012 19:14
This "Regular Channel" crap has maybe a handful of posts every day, and I'm pretty sure it's just the owner. Magically, it's getting 20 or more +5 votes every day.

There is some other retard who is getting random bullshit domains to redirect to his child porn site. He has at least 5 listings right now.

Some other idiot is using another site's banner.

Please get some quality control up in here.

I want to say that the reviews are so easy to cheat that there are chan owners that make bad reviews behind proxies only to bring the good chans to the bottom.

The review method would be great if there were no cheating, but this is not the case. Also, people who review and rate are mostly chan owners and not casual visitors who visit chans and rate them, so the results are not objective at all. Sorry to say this, but it's the truth.

Exactly this.
Author Guest
#17 | Posted: 21 Aug 2012 19:19
Then you have shit like this: http://topchan.info/chans/0verchan

Just plain spam.

Please check every listing one by one.
Author Admin
#18 | Posted: 21 Aug 2012 22:48 | Edited by: Admin
I'm pretty sure it's just the owner. Magically, it's getting 20 or more +5 votes every day.

You really got to have no life to come here everyday and spend the time jumping across proxies to vote up a stupid website.

Anyway.. I'll probably be adding SpammerSlapper to the review system. It should solve the public proxy issue.
Author Guest
#19 | Posted: 31 Aug 2012 14:43
all the chans in the top 10 are crap and are only there bc the owner proxies positive hits all day and gives the good chans 0 ratings. we have to do away with this system so the douchebag site owners (karachan transchan malegeneral) can disappear cuz they get little traffic. let traffic be the determinate of how good a chan is-its like survival of the fittest or basic economics.
Author Guest
#20 | Posted: 1 Sep 2012 19:34
>transchan malegeneral
>little traffic

Right, and your child porn sites get so much non-bot traffic!
Author Guest
#21 | Posted: 2 Sep 2012 01:00
Problem with the traffic based ranking is that anyone can stick the button code anywhere to generate fake hits.
Author Guest
#22 | Posted: 2 Sep 2012 10:52
après site exceptionnel. Je vais mettre en signet et vérifier beaucoup plus souvent. J'aime vraiment le modèle de site Web
 Page Page 2 of 2:  ««  1  2 
Questions topchan.info Forum / Questions / About Reviews Top
Your Reply Click this icon to move up to the quoted message

Clicking on the ads will open a new window or tab.

You are welcome to post anonymously by entering a nickname (if that nickname has not been taken by another member) or by leaving the fields empty. If you have a forums membership account, you can also sign in from the front page.

Protected by Spammer Slapper